Showing posts with label astrophysics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label astrophysics. Show all posts

3 Kejadian Angkasa Luar Mengejutkan di Bulan April 2025: Hujan Meteor dan Konjungsi Planet

April 2025 membawa deretan fenomena langit yang memukau untuk diamati, cocok bagi para pemula dan juga pencinta astronomi. Dimulai dengan munculnya bulan purnama sampai kejadian istimewa di mana kedua planet terlihat bersebelahan.

Tiga peristiwa tersebut mengingatkan kita tentang keelokan serta dinamisme alam semesta yang selalu berkembang. Mengutip dari halaman Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengadaan Inovasi Nasional Dan dari sumber lain, berikut tiga fenomena langit yang akan terjadi pada bulan April tahun 2025.

1. Malam bulan purnama (13 April)

Pada tanggal 13 April 2025, bulan akan mencapai tahapan purnama, memamerkan wajah lengkapnya yang cerah dan gemilang di atas langit malam. Fenomena ini muncul saat bulan berposisi persis di seberang matahari, membuat semua bagian permukaannya yang mengarah ke bumi mendapatkan pencahayaaan sepenuhnya.

Waktu ini sangat ideal untuk para astronom yang ingin mengagumi keunikan permukaan Bulan menggunakan teleskop. Tambahan pula, sinar cerah pada saat Bulan purnama kerap kali menciptakan atmosfer khusus dalam bidang fotografi malam hari.

2. Puncak hujan meteor Lyrid (21-22 April)

Satu lagi pertunjukan langit malam yang dinanti-nantikan setiap tahun, yaitu hujan meteor Lyrid, akan mencapai puncaknya di antara malam 21 sampai subuh 22 April 2025. Hujan meteor ini terjadi karena adanya partikel-partikel halus dari komet Thatcher (C/1861 G1), dan ciri khasnya adalah gerakan meteor-meteor cepat dengan kecepatan sekitar 49 km per detik.

Rasi bintang Lyra, yang merupakan titik masuk meteor, akan timbul kira-kira pada pukul 22:08 Waktu Indonesia Bagian. Meskipun demikian, observasi kali ini bisa jadi kurang optimal lantaran adanya cahaya bulan di tahap separuh akhir.

Di puncaknya, diperkirakan kurang lebih 18 meteor setiap jam dapat diamati. Walaupun demikian, pertunjukan Langit Hujan Lyrid masih memberikan tontonan yang memukau.

3. Perjumpaan Planet Venus dan Saturnus (29 April)

Mendekati penghujung bulan, Venus dan Saturnus akan mengalami fenomena konjungsi sehingga kedua benda langit tersebut kelihatan sangat dekat dengan jarak sudut kira-kira 3 derajat. Mereka akan naik ke langit secara bersamaan, dengan Saturnus tampil lebih dahulu pada pukul 03:13 WIB, disusul oleh Venus hanya selang satu menit setelahnya.

Kedua planet tersebut bakal kelihatan jelas di bagian langit timur sebelum sinar mentari menjadi lebih mencolok. Ketika sang surya muncul, Venesia dan Satornis masih bisa dilihat sekitar 31 derajat dari garis horizon. Inilah saat ideal bagi Anda untuk mengamatinya secara kasat mata ataupun menggunakan teleskop sederhana.

April 2025 membawa sejumlah atraksi langit yang memukau untuk disaksikan, termasuk bulan purnama dan kongkurensi planet. Masing-masing kejadian tersebut merupakan bukti betapa luarbiasanya jagad raya kita.

The Tiny World That Stunned the Skies: Pluto's Discovery 95 Years Ago Today

(Correction: A previous version of this article incorrectly stated the distance between Pluto and the Sun. The accurate figure is 3.7 billion miles.)

What was found in Flagstaff, Arizona, and eliminated in Prague?

If you said "Pluto's planethood," then your understanding of astronomy is spot-on.

Begin your day with more knowledge. Receive all the essential news directly in your mailbox every morning.

Feb. 18 marks the 95th anniversary of the discovery of our solar system's former ninth planet—not a planet.

Here’s what you should know regarding the brief existence of what was, within one person's lifespan, considered the tiniest planet in our solar system.

When was Pluto discovered?

Clyde Tombaugh, an American astronomer working at the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, found Pluto in 1930.

Chilly, dimly lit, and far away, it was renamed after the Roman deity of the Underworld In Greek mythology, the associated deity is Hades.

The planet's presence was initially hypothesized over three decades prior by American astronomer Percival Lowell. His analysis of planetary orbit patterns, meteor shower trajectories, and comet paths guided him to this conclusion. propose the presence of a ninth planet , which became known as Planet X.

Lowell looked for this distant planet, yet he passed away in 1916 without ever locating it.

Utilizing an instrument referred to as a blink comparator In 1930, Tombaugh ultimately discovered the enigmatic celestial object. The process entailed capturing sets of photographs of the night sky taken a few evenings apart and subsequently utilizing a specialized device to swiftly alternate between the two images. By doing this rapid alternation—or “blinking”—between pictures, the astronomer could detect subtle variations and identify motion.

Tombaugh endured long months at the unheated Lowell Observatory until February 1930 when he spotted a heavenly body moving between two images, as detailed in a study published by the institution. American Physical Society The discovery was reported on March 13, 1930.

Pluto's reign

For years, students memorized the saying "My Very Educated Mother Just Served Us Nine Pizzas" to recall the sequence of planets in our solar system: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto.

Pluto was the final and smallest among them.

A small frozen planet, roughly half the size of the United States, typically resided about 3.7 billion miles away from the Sun. Its orbit was notably peculiar—highly elliptical and inclined at an angle. Sometimes it gets as close to the Sun as Neptune does. .

It features an atmosphere composed of methane, nitrogen, and carbon monoxide, with a surface temperature ranging from minus 378 to minus 396 degrees Fahrenheit, far too frigid to support life.

In 2015, NASA dispatched its spacecraft, New Horizons, for a close encounter. This mission verified that the small planet had an underground ocean concealed under its dense, icy crust.

When was Pluto reclassified as not being a planet, and what were the reasons for this change?

Pluto has consistently found itself in a precarious position regarding its status as a planet. With a width of just 1,477 miles, it measures merely one-fifth the size of our home planet, Earth.

It has five recognized satellites: Charon, Nix, Hydra, Kerberos, and Styx, which are all names derived from characters in Greek mythology linked to the underworld.

However, Charon was only half as large as Pluto, making it quite substantial in comparison. The Pluto-Charon system is often called a binary pair of planets. , according to NASA.

In August 2006, during the International Astronomical Union General Assembly, a resolution was passed to redesignate Pluto as a dwarf planet. This decision was based on the fact that it failed to meet one of the three new requirements established for classifying celestial bodies as planets. They were :

  • The body needs to revolve around its host star, similar to how Earth and Jupiter circle the Sun.
  • It is big enough to have a nearly spherical shape.
  • This significant impact plays a crucial role in maintaining the orbital stability of nearby celestial bodies.

Due to failing to meet the final criteria, Pluto was downgraded to a dwarf planet following extensive discussions. This decision came from a majority vote conducted during the International Astronomical Union’s yearly gathering in Prague.

This led to significant public outrage. Caltech astronomer Michael Brown, whose research contributed to the demotion, received irate emails from students and some vulgar telephone calls .

He ultimately released a book called "Why I Executed Pluto and Why It Deserved It."

Tombaugh passed away in 1997. Never realizing the world he found had lost its planetary status .

The article initially appeared on USA TODAY. The small world once deemed a planet: Pluto's discovery celebrates its 95th anniversary today.

Mystery at the Galaxy's Core: Could Hidden Dark Matter Hold the Key? 'Scientists Suspect Overlooked Chemical Clues'

Unusual occurrences observed right at the centre of the Milky Way might serve as compelling proof for a newly proposed form of dark matter. Should this indeed be true, researchers could have overlooked the discreet influence of such matter. dark matter , the cosmos' most enigmatic 'material,' within the realm of cosmic chemistry.

This newly proposed dark matter candidate not only would this new form of dark matter be lighter than current theoretical candidates, but it would also annihilate itself. Meaning that upon collision with another particle of dark matter, they would mutually destruct and produce a negative charge. electron And its positively charged counterpart, a positron.

This process and the flood of electrons and positrons would provide the energy needed to strip electrons away from neutral atoms, a process called ionization, in dense gas in the center of the Milky Way. That could explain why there is so much ionized gas in the central region called the Central Molecular Zone (CMZ).

Even if the annihilation of dark matter is rare, it stands to reason it would occur more frequently at the heart of galaxies where it is thought to conglomerate.

"We propose that dark matter lighter than a proton [the particles found in the nuclei of atoms] could be responsible for an unusual effect seen in the center of the Milky Way Team Leader and Postdoctoral Research Fellow at King's College London, Shyam Balaji stated, 'In contrast to many typical dark matter candidates that are usually investigated via their gravitational impacts, this type of dark matter could potentially be identified through its ability to ionize gas, effectively removing electrons from atoms within the Central Molecular Zone.'

This could occur if dark matter particles destroy each other. electron-positron pairs , which subsequently interacts with the surrounding gas."

Dark matter chemistry

It is believed that dark matter makes up about 85% of the material in the universe; however, even though it is widespread, scientists cannot observe it like much of regular matter. This is due to dark matter’s lack of interaction with light—or if it does interact minimally—it happens far too infrequently to detect directly.

This indicates that scientists have determined that dark matter cannot consist of baryonic particles such as electrons, protons, and neutrons, which make up the atoms forming ordinary matter. stars, planets, moons, along with all the things we encounter regularly.

The sole rationale for scientists hypothesizing the existence of dark matter is due to its interaction with light and matter. gravity, And this influence affects both light and "normal" matter.

This has led scientists to explore further than what is known as the " standard model of particle physics to look for particles that might explain dark matter.

These particles differ in their mass, measured in electronvolts (eV), as well as in properties. There is speculation that certain ones, akin to this newly identified candidate, might annihilate themselves.

The current "leading suspects" for dark matter are axions and axion-like particles, which come in a wide range of masses. However, Balaji and colleagues have mostly ruled out axions and axion-like particles as their dark matter culprits linked to the ionization of gas in the CMZ.

"Most axion models do not predict significant annihilation into electron-positron pairs in the way our proposed dark matter does," Balaji said. "Our proposed dark matter subject is sub-GeV (one billion eV) in mass and self-annihilates into electrons and positrons."

"This sets it apart because it directly affects the interstellar medium , generating a distinctive mark through additional ionization, which is not usually anticipated from axions."

Dark matter: Its own greatest adversary

Within the tightly clustered CMZ, generated positrons cannot move far or exit before interacting with surrounding hydrogen molecules, causing them to lose their electrons. This renders the process highly effective in this core area.

"The primary issue this model addresses is an overabundance of ionization in the CMZ," Balaji stated. Cosmic rays , the typical agents responsible for ionizing gas appear insufficient to account for the elevated levels of ionization we are observing."

Cosmic rays are charged particles that zip around close to the speed of light. speed of light However, based on the findings of this research group, the ionization signal originating from the CMZ appears to suggest a less massive source that is moving at a slower pace compared to numerous alternative dark matter possibilities.

Additionally, if cosmic rays were causing ionization of the gas within the Central Molecular Zone (CMZ), one would expect accompanying emissions. gamma rays These are extremely energetic photons. Nonetheless, such emissions are absent from research focusing on the Central Molecular Zone (CMZ).

“If dark matter is causing the ionization of the Central Molecular Zone, it would imply that we’re identifying dark matter through its faint chemical influence on the gases within our galaxy rather than directly observing it,” explained Balaji.

Nevertheless, there is an enigmatic weak gamma-ray emission emanating from the center of our galaxy which could potentially be associated with positrons and ionization.

If we establish a clear link between ionization and this gamma-ray emission, it might bolster the argument for dark matter," Balaji stated. "While there appears to be an association between these two signals, we require additional data at present to make a firmer claim.

Furthermore, this annihilation theory of dark matter might also account for an observable light emission from the Central Molecular Zone caused by collisions between positively charged positrons and negatively charged electrons merging into a state known as positronium , which subsequently breaks down quickly into X-rays, Light with marginally less energy than gamma rays.

The figures align far more closely than anticipated. Typically, dark matter theories encounter problems as they anticipate signals that would likely have been detected by telescopes already," Balaji stated. "However, with this scenario, the ionization rate generated by sub-GeV dark matter sits comfortably inside recognized limits, without conflicting with current gamma-ray observations. cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations."

The researcher noted that the initial convergence with the X-ray emission is equally fascinating.

"That's a rare and exciting situation in dark matter research," Balaji added.

The early stages of this potential dark matter candidate are still underway.

Certainly, this fresh contender for dark matter is still in the early stages of its theoretical existence; it hasn’t been bestowed with a catchy moniker such as WIMP (Weakly Interacting Massive Particle) or MACHO (MAssive Compact Halo Object)!

For comparison, axions have existed since their initial conception by theoretical physicists. Frank Wilczek and Steven Weinberg in 1978.

This indicates that extensive theoretical work needs to be carried out before this candidate can join others like axions, WIMPs, MACHOs, primordial black holes, and the like in the realm. dark matter suspect line-up.

We require more accurate measurements of ionization within the Central Molecular Zone; achieving this precision would allow us to determine if the ionization aligns with the anticipated distribution of dark matter," stated Balaji. "By eliminating alternative explanations for the observed ionization, the case for the dark matter theory strengthens considerably.

Additional proof linking annihilating dark matter to unusual signals from the CMZ might come from NASA’s forthcoming mission. COSI (The Compton Spectrometer and Imager) gamma-ray observatory, scheduled for launch in 2027.

COSI ought to offer improved data concerning astrophysical phenomena at the MeV (1 million electron volts) level, which might assist in validating or dismissing this particular theory about dark matter.

In any event, this study has yielded a a fresh perspective on the impact of dark matter .

Dark matter continues to be one of the greatest enigmas in physics, and this research suggests that we might have missed its gentle chemical influence on the universe," Balaji stated. "If this hypothesis stands true, it could introduce a completely novel approach to investigating dark matter—one that goes beyond its gravitational pull and delves into how it moulds the structure of our Milky Way.

The group's findings were released on Monday (March 10) in the journal Physical Review Letters.

Science's Top Theory About the Moon Might Be Dead Wrong

It has often been said that the Moon came into existence when a Mars-sized body dubbed Theia smashed into Earth , propelling matter into space which ultimately formed our cherished cosmic companion.

This concept, referred to as the giant impact hypothesis, aids in explaining why Earth and the Moon have several shared characteristics, such as similar minerals.

And yet, a new study Has created a significant gap in this broadly accepted theory due to one prominent reason: we lack any concrete proof of such a large-scale event occurring.

Paolo Sossi, the planetary scientist at the helm of this pioneering study, informed ScienceAlert The secret behind his team's latest discovery hinges on examining rocks sourced from the Earth’s mantle as well as those from the Moon.

He pointed out that the isotope ratios in both samples are virtually the same, but added that "if there were any signs of an impacting object, we would anticipate observing slight variations."

Therefore, he stated: “Our contention is that if an impact occurred, both celestial bodies would have had to mix thoroughly… or alternatively, the Moon must have originated through a distinct formation process.”

Frankly, this does not rule out that the massive collision might not have happened. It simply indicates that we cannot confidently assert that it occurred.

To put it differently, the genuine beginnings of the Moon still puzzle scientists.

If there wasn't such a significant collision, then how did the Moon originate?

In the end, the giant impact hypothesis has a great deal of merit. Following all, conditions were quite tumultuous during that time. Solar System was just beginning about 4.5 billion years ago.

There were numerous rocks scattered about, making it quite possible that our infant Earth was struck by an object similar to Theia.

According to Sossi and his team, the problem lies in the similarity between Earth and the Moon. Many components found on both celestial bodies exhibit matching ratios of isotopes—variations of atoms containing the same number of protons but differing neutron counts—in their nuclei. ScienceAlert notes.

Sossi pointed out that initially, this correlation was observed exclusively among oxygen isotopes. However, since the early 2010s, it has also been identified in chromium and titanium—elements that are present only within the rocky sections of celestial bodies.

In addition, since the isotopes of these elements show significant variation across different planetary materials, if there had been any sign of an impacting object, we would anticipate observing slight discrepancies in their isotopic compositions. However, no such disparities have been found when comparing the Earth and the Moon.

He went on: "It has similarly been demonstrated for numerous additional elements (such as iron, calcium, molybdenum, among others) indicating that the possibility of this occurring randomly is extraordinarily slim."

Additionally, a new research suggests that Earth and the Moon might be approximately the same age – or more precisely, they were formed within a short period of each other roughly 4.5 billion years ago.

Various bits of evidence have prompted Sossi to determine that the duo originated from the same cloud of matter, thereby eliminating the necessity for any additional entity—be it Theia or anything else—to be part of the process.

Certainly, our planet and its natural satellite stand out in the Solar System as the only pair of sizable spherical entities featuring distinctively layered cores.

Actually, if the Moon – which isn’t significantly smaller than Mercury – were orbiting independently in space, it might well be classified as a planet itself. ScienceAlert points out.

The Moon is also acknowledged for its significant impact on the development of life on our planet Earth. It aids in stabilising the Earth's rotation and creates tidal movements that assist ocean circulation.

In simple terms, our Earth would be a vastly distinct world without our beloved companion.

Is it possible we'll definitively determine how the Moon came into being?

At present, we genuinely do not understand how Earth and the Moon formed from a cloud of stardust around 4.5 billion years ago. However, Sossi and his team believe there are methods to uncover this mystery.

He thinks that the subsequent move should be exploring what lies within the Moon, which is currently the focus of his team’s efforts.

"Sufficiently robust chemical and isotopic evidence has emerged to begin challenging the basic principles behind how the Moon was formed," according to Sossi.

We’re equally delighted to observe how the geophysical, geochemical, and dynamical constraints can intertwine to offer a fresh, comprehensive perspective on lunar formation.

He concluded: "We can discuss shared issues spanning different fields, which will eventually assist us in solving this puzzle."

Sign up For our complimentary weekly newsletter from aynur1015.blogspot.com

How to join The free WhatsApp channel from Aynur1015.blogspot.com

Aynur1015.blogspot.com stands out with its dynamic and forward-thinking approach, covering a wide range of subjects including trending viral content, celebrities, science, technology, and beyond. This platform delivers up-to-the-minute insights through comprehensive Gen-Z guides, popular TikTok phenomena, detailed explanations from influencers, along with critical updates on key issues. Whether you're looking for the newest social media fads or intricate narratives presented via interactive maps and graphs, Aynur1015.blogspot.com has got your back. Make sure to follow Aynur1015.blogspot.com at the beginning of each piece.

Alien Hunt Gets Easier: New Oxygen Reaction Discovery Could Be Key

'Just as oxygen is essential for the lungs, hope is vital to giving purpose to one’s life.'

This quote comes from the book "Eternal Hope" written by Emil Brunner, who was a Swiss theologian.

The man actually intended to convey that oxygen is the key to discovering life outside of our planet.

Oxygen is considered essential for life on Earth because it is primarily generated by living organisms.

However, researchers have found a novel method for oxygen to develop in planetary atmospheres dense with carbon dioxide, eliminating the requirement for living organisms.

Researchers told Space.com How they searched for innovative methods to generate molecular oxygen by colliding CO2 with helium.

This method of producing oxygen is termed an 'abiotic' process, which means it does not entail living organisms.

The enrichment of Earth’s atmosphere with oxygen, occurring approximately between 2.1 to 2.4 billion years ago, remains one of the greatest enigmas in history. Prior to this event, which geologists refer to as the Great Oxidation Event, much of our planet was enveloped in the pungent greenhouse gas CO2.

The presence of oxygen became noticeable in the atmosphere once ancient marine microorganisms developed the capability for photosynthesis. Following their exposure to sunlight, these organisms released oxygen into the environment.

Much of this oxygen did not persist for an extended period. Given the numerous volcanoes active back then, hydrogen likely consumed most of it.

However, after several hundreds of millions of years, as the Earth started to cool down, it provided an opportunity for our unusually oxygen-abundant atmosphere to develop.

Shan Xi Tian and Jie Hu from the University of Science and Technology of China chose to investigate how helium produced through interactions between solar winds and a planet's atmosphere might generate oxygen.

In this process, helium forms ions—charged particles that behave akin to wrecking balls, colliding with CO2 and causing it to smash into other molecules.

'This phenomenon can be observed in Mars' upper atmosphere as it contains numerous He+ ions (from solar winds) along with CO2,' explained Hu.

However, despite the formation of O+, O2+, and CO2+, O2 does not appear, at least not on Mars.

Tian and Hu employed three methods from their toolkit to put their concept to the test.

The initial method is time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry, where particles become ions and are accelerated to achieve equal kinetic energy. The duration taken for them to cover the same distance is utilized to determine their mass.

The duo utilized a 'crossed-beam apparatus' for colliding two molecules, along with 'ion velocity maps' to document the paths and speeds of the resulting ions.

'We discovered a significantly different mechanism for producing O2 from molecular CO2,' Tian stated. 'Specifically, via the interaction between helium ions [He+] and CO2.'

To put it simply, Tian and Hu’s research discovered that life-supporting oxygen might develop on planets with CO2-heavy atmospheres before any living organisms have appeared there.

David Benoit, who serves as a senior lecturer in Molecular Physics and Astrochemistry at the University of Hull’s EA Milne Centre for Astrophysics, now indicates that the quest is underway to locate planets where this might plausibly occur.

'This innovative mechanism is expected to be included in upcoming models designed to forecast the atmospheres of other planets,' Benoit stated to Space.com. 'It will assist us in more accurately explaining the levels of oxygen we may discover.'

Contact our news team by sending an email to webnews@aynur1015.blogspot.com.co.uk .

To find similar tales, check our news page .

Be among those who catch all the buzzworthy tales by subscribing to aynur1015.blogspot.com's News Updates newsletter.

Mystery Radio Signals Emanate From Uncharted Space Region, Baffling Scientists

For a decade, Earth has been on the receiving end of enigmatic occurrences. radio emissions every two hours.

Following over ten years, the origin of these signals has at last been pinpointed near the constellation of the Big Dipper.

A study published in Nature Astronomy reveals a close pair of stars—a red dwarf and a white dwarf—that orbit each other so closely that their magnetic fields interact with each other every two hours, producing detectable radio emissions during these collisions.

The finding is unexpected for researchers, who until now had solely been able to link radio bursts to neutron stars.

Doctor Iris de Ruiter, who headed the research, said 'We collaborated with specialists from various fields within astronomy.'

'Using various methods and insights, we gradually moved nearer to solving the problem.'

Researchers have managed to capture a particular type of radio signal from a galaxy that’s approximately 9 billion light-years from our planet.

The signal did not originate from aliens; instead, it came from a star-forming galaxy known as 'SDSSJ0826+5630', which existed when the universe was approximately 4.9 billion years old.

The uniqueness of this radio signal lies in its specific wavelength, referred to as the '21 cm line'.

'It's like looking back in time for 8.8 billion years,' explained Arnab Chakraborty, a cosmologist and co-author of the study on this discovery.

This kind of radio signal had never before been observed at such an immense distance.

In 2022, comparable radio signals guided scientists to the detection of a neutron star. a star differing from any discovered before.

Unusual pulses lasting approximately 300 milliseconds each were observed by Manisha Caleb, who is a lecturer at the University of Sydney.

'The flash exhibited traits similar to those of a radio-emitting neutron star. However, this was unlike anything we had encountered previously,' she said. said .

A neutron star represents the condensed remnants of a large supergiant star. Aside from a black hole, they stand as the most compact and dense celestial bodies identified by humans.

When they are particularly dense, these objects can be referred to as pulsars – and frequently are. release pulses of radio waves that we can detect on Earth.

It was discovered that the neutron star emitted pulses never observed before.

Contact our news team by sending an email to webnews@aynur1015.blogspot.com.co.uk .

To find similar stories, check our news page .

Get the latest on all the buzzworthy stories by subscribing to aynur1015.blogspot.com's News Updates newsletter.