Showing posts with label computers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label computers. Show all posts

How Africa Can Forge Its AI-Powered Economic Future

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is emerging as a transformative force comparable to previous General-Purpose Technologies (GPTs) that drove past industrial revolutions, poised to bring about even greater changes in Africa.

Brad Smith, the co-chair and president of Microsoft, emphasized the significance of this technology when he stated, "Throughout history, technological advancements have reshaped economies," as he elucidated.

He states that the initial Industrial Revolution was fueled by advancements in ironworking, the subsequent one by electrification and machinery, and the most recent revolution—which has unfolded over the past five decades—by innovations in computer chips and software.

Smith points out that whenever a new Industrial Revolution occurs, people often focus on identifying the key leader," he says. "However, historical evidence shows that the nations making the greatest strides are typically those where the technology becomes broadly disseminated and embraced.

Since technology transforms all aspects of an economy, the nation that utilizes it extensively will reap the greatest benefits.

This can be clearly seen in the case of electricity: gross domestic product (GDP) grows as electricity is adopted and used. “There is no country where this is the ex­ception,” Smith states. “And the same is true in Africa.”

He notes that the secret to achieving future success lies in implementing versatile technologies.

In this emerging AI age, we begin with the firm belief that it represents the next evolution of GPT.

According to Smith, countries aiming to successfully adopt a GPT must excel in four areas.

The initial point is the technology itself. "As it happens, each GPT relies on a technological framework. This gives rise to a novel economic landscape because each level within this framework corresponds to emerging businesses, different kinds of enterprises, and distinct employment opportunities."

The current AI technological framework comprises three tiers: infrastructure, platform, and applications.

“IS has an enormous presence,” Smith states. “It demands the billions of rands we’re putting into data centers. Similar to how you cannot generate electricity without power plants, artificial intelligence cannot function without these data centers.”

The platform level comprises both open-source and proprietary models designed to utilize data for training purposes. "It is here that a fresh wave of AI platforms and software solutions are coming into existence."

On top sits the application layer, enabling individuals to accomplish their tasks.

"Electricity brought about transformative changes at the level of appliances, and similarly today, with the AI technology stack, it is the applications that people interact with and utilize," Smith explains.

To develop a new AI-driven economy, you must have all three elements in place to kickstart the cycle. The infrastructure enables the development of models, which permits individuals to create applications—subsequently, this fosters more extensive expansion of the infrastructure.

He points to the South African Revenue Services (SARS) as a premier instance of an organization leveraging technology, including artificial intelligence, for tax collection purposes and transforming citizen interactions with governmental bodies.

When developing a new economy, both governments and businesses must focus not only on mastering the technology but also on understanding economics thoroughly, according to Smith.

“The economics of AI comes down to eco­nomic structure, financial architecture and business models.”

For instance, he points out that each technology stack includes an economic framework, where components at the base tend to be costly, whereas those at the summit are relatively inexpensive.

“It is the same with AI: you see billions of dollars invested at the infrastructure layer; and find students can start to build new companies relatively cheaply at the applications layer.”

Following this, it's essential to develop a financial framework. Smith points out that companies such as Microsoft are collaborating with partners to fund the establishment of AI infrastructure globally.

This usually begins with private companies and private funds, followed by sovereign wealth and additional public financing. This structure isn't solely aimed at releasing capital; it also focuses on stimulating demand.

When nations struggle to gather the necessary amount of capital, Smith suggests that they might consider forming partnerships within geographical regions. "An alternative approach to speed things up is increased usage by the public sector," he adds.

The government plays a crucial role in initiating this process, primarily through policy formulation and ensuring that all aspects of the public sector adopt the technology.

Developing appropriate business models is the ultimate, and essential, stage for achieving sustainable success. As Smith highlights, "We can gain insights from history showing that these business models tend to evolve."

The third crucial step for capitalizing on the emerging AI economy involves developing skills.

This is merely practical," argues Smith. "If it's crucial for something to be utilized across the entire economy, then the expertise needed for this should also be widespread throughout the economic landscape.

The earlier Industrial Revolutions tackled this issue through technical schools and apprenticeships during the first revolution; public universities funded by federal lands along with industry standards in the second; and workforce training alongside computer science programs in tertiary education during the third.

When considering large-scale skill development for the age of artificial intelligence, Smith argues that we require three categories of abilities: first, AI literacy, enabling individuals to utilize these technologies effectively in their tasks; second, AI engineering, an extension of traditional computer science; and third, AI system design, aimed at empowering non-technical professionals with the knowledge needed to integrate AI into strategic planning, operational procedures, and process optimization within businesses.

"Each nation requires a comprehensive AI talent plan to evaluate market demands and increase AI literacy," according to Smith.

This would cover more than just universities and technikons; it should also incorporate programs such as South Africa’s Youth Employment Scheme (YES), aimed at wider skill development.

For a technology to become truly perva­sive, it must have a level of social accep­tance, Smith says.

And for a technology to gain social acceptance, it needs to be both beneficial and reliable.

The development of a genuine strategy and framework of trust is essential for the future of AI.

To establish this trust, privacy, digital security, and ethical AI are essential, he notes.

This is precisely why we're developing AI governance from scratch, starting with internal corporate policies and extending to global regulations.

According to Smith, sustainability is a crucial component of the trust formula. He emphasizes, "It’s impossible to adopt a responsible stance towards AI without tackling the necessity for sustainable AI practices."

To turn the AI economy into a reality, companies and nations must concentrate on every aspect. "This is incredible, exhilarating, and intimidating," Smith remarks.

He emphasizes that the key to accomplishing everything lies in being inspired. "Consider all the incredible possibilities we have with AI."

“However, while we ought to find motivation in every potential success, we should equally draw inspiration from each possible failure.”

For instance, he highlights that it has been 140 years since Thomas Edison brought electric power to lower Manhattan. Nevertheless, currently, a significant portion of Africa’s population remains without access to electricity.

“This is a cautionary tale that should in­spire is to do better,” Smith says.

We can aim higher, be more daring, and chase after something even Edison couldn’t have imagined.

Provided by Syndigate Media Inc. ( Syndigate.info ).

Is AI Leading Us Astray? – International Edition (English)

Based on findings from 2025 conducted by Prioridata—a U.S.-based data firm—an individual typically dedicates approximately 4 hours and 43 minutes each day gazing at their smartphones. Over the span of one year, this accumulates to roughly 70 full days spent engaged with these devices. Such statistics come as little surprise considering how extensively we have integrated various digital instruments like social platforms, instant messaging apps, along with built-in artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies, into our everyday lives faster than ever previously measured throughout human chronicles.

Paradoxically, the introduction of computers around the turn of the millennium sparked opposition fueled by political and religious groups. This led to widespread fear and hostility among people, giving rise to numerous conspiracy theories such as concerns that 'robots' might someday attain autonomy and aim to obliterate humanity. Today, nearly two decades later, this initial resistance has evolved into a near-reliance on technology.

Collaboration between humans and AI systems, including well-known platforms like ChatGPT, MidJourneyAI, MetaAI, Grammarly, and more recently, DeepSeek AI, has transformed fields such as academia and journalism. However, growing concerns surround the reliability and credibility of information produced by these tools. Videos, images, and audio recordings—all can now be replicated or created within moments. Initially, rudimentary forgeries were often met with dismissal due to their obvious inaccuracies. Yet, in a brief period, they've evolved into sophisticated deepfakes utilized in news and media, making it ever more challenging to distinguish artificial content from reality. This raises significant questions regarding how AI might serve as a tool for spreading false information. Malicious parties could exploit this technology to promote specific agendas, potentially leading to large-scale manipulations driven by substantial financial backing. Such actions may result in widespread behavioral shifts, fostering extreme viewpoints and provoking disorderly conduct across different communities.

If we cannot rely on our senses, then what else can we depend upon?

Experts are concerned with how much individuals can be swayed by carefully selected content driven by algorithms and biased artificial intelligence systems that perpetuate current prejudices. The worries surrounding AI extend further than mere disinformation issues. They encompass concerns related to breaches of personal data, risks to employment stability, and fears of deliberate misguidance within society. In response to these challenges, efforts have promoted the deployment of AI detection tools designed to ascertain the proportion of textual and visual material produced through language-learning models. However, despite such measures, these safeguards often fall short due to vulnerabilities in their programming and frequent instances of incorrect alerts and susceptibility to manipulation.

Even though artificial intelligence does not generate fake news, it serves as a potent instrument easily available to everyone. This availability has facilitated the dissemination of inaccurate stories when misused. Some people contend that misleading information prevails regardless of AI, and the simplification of data contributes to our cognitive decline. Rather than rejecting AI outright due to these concerns, responsibility falls upon authorities, institutions, and citizens to promote responsible use and reap maximum advantages from this technology.

This problem requires promoting healthy skepticism, enhancing media literacy, implementing stricter governmental rules, and increasing openness regarding the use and advancement of AI.

In the end, AI will only be as trustworthy as the individuals who create and utilize it. As AI advances, we too must improve our skills in examining and rigorously assessing the information we encounter.

Becky Osazuwa has sent a message from Abuja through beckyosazuwa89@gmail.com

Provided by Syndigate Media Inc. ( Syndigate.info ).

中國祖沖之三號量子計算機超越谷歌懸鈴木:速度領先六個數量級

中國科學技術大學及其他科研機構共同開發了「祖沖之三號」這款超导量子计算原型机,该设备拥有105个读取比特和182个耦合比特,在处理量子随机线路采样任务时表现出色。其运算速度快于当前最快的超级计算机达十五倍之多,并且领先谷歌在二零四年的十月发布的同类产品六个数量级。这一重要研究成果已在二五年三月三日作为期刊封面文章发表在《物理评论快报》上。

研究團隊利用梯度超表面技術,通過操控光子產生糾纏態,突破傳統量子資訊處理的限制。此技術能於緊湊空間內生成並融合多光子糾纏,提升量子計算及通訊效率。網上資料顯示,此成果獲學界讚譽為「量子資訊處理新視角」,有望應用於晶片級微型量子設備及量子網路建設。

研究小組基於之前的「祖冲之二号」66 qubit(量子位)平台,開發出了全新的「祖冲之三号」超导量子計算原型機,這款新設備具備105個數據qubits和182個耦合qubits,在全球範圍內處於領先地位。此系統的量子bit相幹壽命長達72微秒,並且其平行單qubit閘操作的準確率高達約99.90%,而平行雙qubit閘的操作準確性則為99.62%,同時,平行讀出的准確性也大約是99.13%。

在一個涉及 83 qubits 及 32 層的隨機線路取樣挑戰中,「祖冲之三号」展示了其運算速度遠超當今最快的超級计算机達十五個數量級,并且還領先谷歌最新研究成果六個數量級,這充分證明了它在量子计算中的卓越能力。「量化优势」(quantum supremacy) 得到了有力展示。這一成就不僅鞏固了該領域的研究基礎,也對未來如量子錯誤校正、量子模擬及量子化学等方面的工作提供了支持。研究小組進一步利用兩維網絡布局芯片結構來實施表面码纠错技术,在距离为七的情况下取得了令人鼓舞的進步;他們計劃將这一距離扩展到九和十一,以助于大规模量子位整合与操控的发展。

▲圖片來源: 鏈新聞

在一個涉及 83 個量子比特及 32 層隨機線路的取樣任務中,「祖冲之三号」展現出超越谷歌公司使用其擁有 67 個量子比特的「悬铃木」处理器的速度。「中国科学技术大学新闻网」報導指出,此原型机的关键性能指标之一是能達到長達 72 微秒的量子位相干时间。

資料來源: 鏈新聞 、 工商時報

相關文章:

  • 亞馬遜AWS豹貓量子芯片發佈,具備錯誤校正功能且降低成本達90%
  • The post 中國開發了祖沖之三號量子計算機,據稱其速度比谷歌的懸鈴木快六個數量級。 appeared first on 香港 玩生活.樂科技 .