- CLICK HERE: Subscribe to Diwida’s daily U.S. politics newsletter >
- PODCAST: Get the latest news and rumors direct from inside the White House - Tune into Welcome to MAGAland here.
Widespread injunctions issued by federal district judges that affect all Americans might soon become an artifact of history following Republicans pushing through legislation to support the Trump administration.
The House approved the 'No Rogue Rulings Act' on Tuesday with a vote of 219 to 213. The legislation will now move to the Republican-controlled Senate, where it is anticipated to be enacted.
This legislation limits federal district courts from imposing nationwide injunctions unless specific conditions apply. Its purpose is to reduce judicial obstacles to the policy initiatives of the Trump administration.
"These unexpected judicial decisions represent a fresh form of opposition to the Trump administration, marking the first instance where such a significant group of judges has deemed it essential to engage in politics," stated Representative Darrell Issa, R-Calif., who authored the legislation, earlier this week.
The federal judiciary is not merely interpreting the law; it is obstructing the presidency. In reality, it does not maintain equality with the other branches of government but views itself as superior.
It was of utmost importance for Republicans to Congress As they assert, 'rogue' judges were incorrectly restricting presidential power.
"We aim to stop activist judges from handing down these unconstitutional nationwide injunctions and making laws from the bench, as this has turned into a significant issue," stated the Speaker. Mike Johnson said Tuesday.
Trump has been frustrated by judges across the country from Washington, D.C., to San Francisco for ruling against his deportation and DOGE orders. The president even took the unprecedented step of calling for one judge's removal.
"This judge, similar to numerous corrupt judges" I have to face, ought to be impeached!" Trump stated regarding Washington, D.C. Judge James Boasberg, who suspended the president’s immigrant relocation initiatives.
Rulings issued by Judge Boasberg and many other judges nationwide caused Trump's deportation plans to come to an abrupt stop.
After this legislation is signed off by Trump, which is anticipated, such judges' decisions might be confined to specific cases. This would enable the president to use his authority freely, unhampered by comprehensive restraining orders spanning across the nation.
"We do hold jurisdiction over the federal courts," Johnson stated while discussing the bill lately.
'We have the option to abolish an entire district court,' he pointed out.
We hold sway over the court's finances and various other aspects. However, in dire circumstances, extreme actions may be necessary, Congress is going to act.'
His comment seemed like an oblique hint, if not outright intimidation, suggesting that Congress possesses the authority to reorganize and cut funding for courts nationwide.
Though the Supreme Court The supreme judicial authority in the nation, along with district courts that have consistently overturned White House executive actions through widespread rulings, falls under congressional oversight.
The president has requested that D.C. district court Judge James Boasberg face impeachment for his decision to issue an injunction against the administration’s deportations of Venezuelans pursuant to the Alien Enemies Act.
The president has similarly criticized district Judge John James McConnell Jr., who ruled in favor of 22 states and the District of Columbia to restore the distribution of federal grants and loans that the administration had halted as they reviewed expenditures related to DOGE.
Republican legislators have already filed Articles of Impeachment against McConnell and an additional judge from Maryland. Theodore Chuang, who recently determined that disbanding USAID is against the Constitution.
Nevertheless, impeachment seems improbable since it would necessitate backing from Democrats.
According to Article III of the Constitution, it falls upon Congress to 'ordain and establish' the courts below the Supreme Court, which implies that legislators are responsible for providing funding and structuring the lower court system.
Read more
