Sir Keir Starmer Will you attempt to quell a rebellion within your ranks this week? Labour Leftover from his ' Trumpian' approach to drastically reduce the oversized British government.
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner Energy Secretary Ed Miliband is at the forefront of opposing departmental spending reductions as part of an overall plan that might involve cutting up to £6 billion from welfare budgets. budget .
The Prime Minister has been informed that he might encounter frontbench resignations, as allies of Mr Miliband have cautioned that even he would quit if the £8 billion budget for GB Energy, the renewable energy initiative dear to him, comes under threat from the Chancellor. Rachel Reeves .
Politicians aligned with the Right wing of the party responded by expressing their support for this move, stating that since the ex-leader is linked to failures and performs poorly in Red Wall constituencies, he should step down. Nevertheless, reports emerged late last night suggesting that Mr Miliband managed to avoid significant reductions to his departmental budget due to concerns about how harmful his departure might be for the government at present.
The potential for significant decreases in the welfare budget along with substantial reductions in other governmental expenditures poses threw the Labour movement into disarray just seven months after Sir Keir assumed office.
During a tumultuous Cabinet meeting last week, Ms Rayner and Mr Miliband were accompanied by several other ministers, including Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood and Commons Leader Lucy Powell, who all strongly opposed proposed reductions of up to 11 percent in what are known as 'unprotected' sectors like environmental services, local governance, and judicial affairs.
Nevertheless, the likelihood of Ms. Reeves cutting budgets or introducing higher taxes in her upcoming spring statement seems to have risen further this week following the announcement that the economy surprisingly shrunk by 0.1 percent in January.
And a cabinet colleague of Sir Keir stated that the prime minister had become more confident due to Donald Trump s rapid public sector overhauls, featuring severe reductions in the U.S. federal workforce under the supervision of Tesla and X boss Elon Musk .
Last week, Sir Keir seemed to demonstrate that with His unexpected declaration that he would eliminate the large quasi-autonomous non-governmental organization known as NHS England. , surprising its 14,000 employees.
The minister stated: "Don't expect to see Keir on stage wielding a chainsaw as Musk did. However, there is no question that we are feeling encouraged by the speed and scope of changes in Washington."
The specifics of significant reductions in the welfare program – which Mr. Keir has characterized as 'untenable' and 'unjustifiable' in terms of expenditure – are being discussed. set to be revealed by Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall later this week Ministers aim to introduce stricter criteria for individuals seeking to obtain personal independence payments.
The expense of the benefit, intended to assist individuals dealing with physical or mental health issues or disabilities with their living costs, has increased twofold over the past five years.
In an outburst from Labour’s left wing, seasoned MP Diane Abbott vehemently protested earlier this week that both she and several fellow MPs couldn’t question Sir Keir during a gathering on the topic as they were informed that the session had reached capacity.
Apparently targeting Sir Keir, she remarked: "Eager for disagreement in other nations—but less so in our country."
The day before, she shared on social media her belief that it would be beneficial if members of the front bench resigned due to proposals to freeze certain disability benefits. She also stated, "Anyone who entered politics with the intention of reducing welfare should have chosen a different party."
A fellow Labour veteran parliamentarian stated: "They might exclude Diane from a Parliamentary Labour Party meeting, but they cannot silence the ordinary members of the Labour party."
If the reductions being discussed go through, Keir Starmer won’t be able to quieten down the party. It would lead to significant backlash from those on the left.
In an article for The Mail on Sunday, ex-Labour Cabinet minister David Blunkett emphasized that reducing the welfare budget and encouraging employment "couldn’t be more timely."
In his article, he states that 'those within my party who doubt must recognize that we cannot simultaneously assist the people who require our support the most and continue to allocate billions of pounds for further social benefits. These objectives are mutually exclusive.'
He stated: "The fact that such a large number of young people are considered entirely inactive poses a generational ticking bomb, likely leading to various societal problems persisting for many years ahead."
Individually, a Labour Member of Parliament forecasted yesterday that even with the growing sidelining of Mr. Miliband's environmental initiative focused on reaching net-zero emissions, the ex-party leader would remain in position since "he values his Red Box and official vehicle too highly."
The MP stated: "It's high time for Ed to take action and make a stance, but he refuses to do so."
The MP cautioned that regardless of what Sir Keir believed, the prime minister’s team harbored strong animosity toward Ed Miliband, particularly Peter Mandelson, who currently serves as Britain's ambassador to the United States. The team further noted, "To them, Ed embodies all the progressive causes they disapprove of, and they view him as an emblem of failure."
Many individuals at Number 10 would rejoice if Ed were to leave since they believe that his focus on environmental issues isn’t proving effective in the constituencies traditionally held by their party.
Read more
