The 2025 Subaru Forester It's an updated version, yet Subaru largely stuck to the blueprint of the previous generation. This compact SUV remains boxy with excellent sightlines, versatile adaptability for adventures, and a straightforward approach to cabin styling. The numerous enhancements introduced in 2025 aim to maintain its competitiveness; however, where does this place it among top contenders within its segment?
Comparing it to the 2025 Honda CR-V It's an excellent starting point. This top-rated and widely favored subcompact SUV should definitely be considered by those looking for a smaller SUV model. Known for having minimal downsides and offering versatility, it can attract many different types of buyers. Our team at Edmunds delves deeper to evaluate which SUV offers greater value overall.
Space and visibility
It doesn’t get much better than the Forester’s visibility. Boxy proportions, big windows, thin roof pillars and a low hood provide an expansive view forward. Add to that the wide door openings and well-positioned seat heights, and the Forester is particularly well suited to older drivers.
For family needs, the CR-V stands out as the superior option due to its greater interior space for passengers and storage. The vehicle offers almost two additional inches of rear-seat legroom along with a significantly bigger cargo hold capacity, varying based on the engine selected. Additionally, visibility from inside the CR-V is clear, and getting into the car is quite easy.
The interior storage space is superior in the CR-V as well, particularly with respect to the wireless charging pad available in higher trim levels – unlike the Forester’s which lacks containment features, causing phones to slide about or even fall off entirely. However, at least the Subaru has robust cup and bottle holders designed to securely hold your beverages in position.
Advantage: CR-V
Interior technology
For the 2025 model, the Forester features an 11.4-inch vertically oriented touchscreen, although this has appeared in various Subaru vehicles over time. The screen tends to have sluggish responses and outdated visuals. Nonetheless, its large icons are straightforward to view and touch. Additionally, numerous physical buttons and traditional analog dials are included, potentially making the transition smoother for drivers moving up from earlier vehicle models.
The CR-V doesn’t lead the pack when it comes to vehicle technology. While the basic 7-inch display is adequate, the upgraded 9-inch screen available in higher trims boasts more contemporary visuals. Although some buttons remain for tactile control, overall, the CR-V appears and feels more current without giving you the sensation of stepping out of your time machine into an advanced automotive era.
Advantage: CR-V
Driving and fuel economy
The Forester will offer a hybrid option starting in late 2025, which should enhance both fuel efficiency and performance. As of now, Edmunds hasn’t evaluated this model, so our focus remains solely on its standard engine—a four-cylinder delivering 180 horsepower. This vehicle accelerates from zero to 60 mph in around 9.2 seconds, which might feel sluggish when merging onto highways or overtaking slower vehicles. However, it performs adequately within urban settings where quick bursts of speed aren’t as crucial.
Although earlier parts of this comparison were more closely contested, the CR-V clearly pulls ahead here. It provides two engine options: a turbocharged four-cylinder producing 190 horsepower or another four-cylinder variant paired with a hybrid system generating 204 horsepower. In terms of acceleration, it outpaces the Subaru by at least one second whether measured on the racetrack or during everyday driving experiences. Additionally, the hybrid version delivers impressive strength and smoothness.
The fuel efficiency is nearly identical between the Forester and the turbocharged CR-V, with both expected to deliver around 28-29 mpg combined according to the EPA estimates, varying slightly based on the specific trim levels. However, the hybrid version of the CR-V sees a significant improvement, achieving approximately 37 mpg combined. Similarly, the forthcoming Forester Hybrid anticipates getting about 35 mpg combined.
Which one is preferable for driving? Irrespective of the engine type, the superior choice is the CR-V. It boasts a quieter interior and offers crisper handling. Additionally, it provides a smoother ride while still maintaining better agility. Although the Forester is adequate and functional, getting you to your destination without issue, the CR-V goes beyond that offering.
Advantage: CR-V
Edmunds says
This particular comparison was not even close. In our rankings, the CR-V secures the second spot among small SUVs, whereas the Forester ranks at number twelve. These ratings highlight certain distinctions between them. Despite this, the Forester remains an excellent option for individuals valuing superior visibility, straightforward interior controls, along with off-road capabilities thanks to features like ample ground clearance, elevated roof rails, and a robust all-wheel-drive setup. However, for the majority of potential purchasers, the top pick would be the CR-V.
_____
The Associated Press received this story from an automotive website. Edmunds James Riswick is an contributor for Edmunds.
